Assignment Details:Topic:In a two-page paper, compare and contrast the utilitarian view of animal rights with Regan’s view of animal rights. Though a stance is not required, be sure you have identified the theories to be compared in your introductory paragraph. See the International Encyclopedia of Philosophy for Regan’s view (Scroll to 3b) http://www.iep.utm.edu/anim-eth/#SH3b Clearly declare a stance/thesis in introductory paragraph Two full pages are requiredCover page and reference page requiredAPA formatting is requiredTwo pieces of support from the week’s material are requiredSupporting your work:Use at least two pieces of information from this week’s assigned material to support your work. You have an option to supplement your work with additional material if needed, which must be from scholarly sources (i.e., peer-reviewed journal articles, books, etc.). Wikipedia is not a credible source.***NOTE:: (The reading that our teacher provided addition to the link above to identify the theories thats asked above)****** = please us both Additional reading our teacher provided with link above (please use both)***(TEACHER instructions to the book below)** : Purtilo, R. B. & Doherty, R. F. (2011). Ethical dimensions in the health professions (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders. — Chapter 4, Paying Attention to Outcomes on p. 92, “Utilitarianism” on p. 92, “Duties, Consequences and a Caring Response” on p. 93Dic The
Eve
ter
Act
ve
93
all chungs considered. In the case of Elizabeth Kimyou met sy “The goal
to treat Max Diar in such a way that everyone else will be able to have the
asociete.” I both of these goals can be attained by taking one single
of action, it should be taken this is not possible the course of action you
believe will bring about the best consequences of outcomes overall should
take pelarity
One important task of this approach is to distinguish alternate paths of
action and then predict as accurately as possible the connequences of each
path Rulesterone are sometimes thought of as a hybrid of deontolog
and utilitarian approaches. Pure utilitarians weigh the consequences soldy
in the specific details of each situation. A rule utilitarian holds that you will
always being about more good consequences by following certain rules
or duties. What the rules should be then becomes the task for these
theorists
Duties, Consequences, and a Caring Response
The deontologic and teleologie normative theories have been helpful tools
for health professionals because they set a general framework for thinking
about specific moral issues and problems in health care settings with a fo-
cus on the action that needs to take place. Probably as you were reading
you were thinking, “Well, both the idea of courses of action consistent with
duties and rights and the idea of consequences or outcomes are important
in my attempt to arrive at a cating response. In fact, most of us do draw
on both to make practical everyday moral decisions. Only occasionally
does it make a big difference in what you judge to be right if you follow
solely a deontologic line of reasoning or appeal to consequences only. For
tunately, most of the time, you can take action that is in line with your
sense of duty, honor others’ rights, and consider the outcomes you are
bringing about without any conflict among the three. But it is in the occa
sional moment during which the means and the ends seem to be compet-
ing that it may become necessary to plant your feet firmly in one theory or
the other and be able to justify why. See Table 4-3 for a brief summary of
deontology and teleology
ole
ES
Table 4-3 Theories of Deontology versus Teleology
Deontology
Teleology
Duty driven
Gcal driven
Means count
Ends count
Kant
Bentham, Mal (utilitarians)
FIFTH EDITION
ETHICAL
LENSIONS
in the Health Professions
RUTH B. PURTILO
REGINA F. DOHERTY
ELSEVIER
SANDERS
Dic The
Eve
ter
Act
ve
93
all chungs considered. In the case of Elizabeth Kimyou met sy “The goal
to treat Max Diar in such a way that everyone else will be able to have the
asociete.” I both of these goals can be attained by taking one single
of action, it should be taken this is not possible the course of action you
believe will bring about the best consequences of outcomes overall should
take pelarity
One important task of this approach is to distinguish alternate paths of
action and then predict as accurately as possible the connequences of each
path Rulesterone are sometimes thought of as a hybrid of deontolog
and utilitarian approaches. Pure utilitarians weigh the consequences soldy
in the specific details of each situation. A rule utilitarian holds that you will
always being about more good consequences by following certain rules
or duties. What the rules should be then becomes the task for these
theorists
Duties, Consequences, and a Caring Response
The deontologic and teleologie normative theories have been helpful tools
for health professionals because they set a general framework for thinking
about specific moral issues and problems in health care settings with a fo-
cus on the action that needs to take place. Probably as you were reading
you were thinking, “Well, both the idea of courses of action consistent with
duties and rights and the idea of consequences or outcomes are important
in my attempt to arrive at a cating response. In fact, most of us do draw
on both to make practical everyday moral decisions. Only occasionally
does it make a big difference in what you judge to be right if you follow
solely a deontologic line of reasoning or appeal to consequences only. For
tunately, most of the time, you can take action that is in line with your
sense of duty, honor others’ rights, and consider the outcomes you are
bringing about without any conflict among the three. But it is in the occa
sional moment during which the means and the ends seem to be compet-
ing that it may become necessary to plant your feet firmly in one theory or
the other and be able to justify why. See Table 4-3 for a brief summary of
deontology and teleology
ole
ES
Table 4-3 Theories of Deontology versus Teleology
Deontology
Teleology
Duty driven
Gcal driven
Means count
Ends count
Kant
Bentham, Mal (utilitarians)
ELSEVIER
SALINDERS
2 altare
9. Love Me
ETHICAL DIMENSIONS IN THEALTH ROSSINI
FIFTH EDETXN
7-8-4377-
Copyright, 18, 19, 20, 2011 by Sanden an imperial Blue
Nappy weddy Bommely any mea deter
meclisten and valem with
per intentaron unha infomation or the
Peperti pada what was the Copyright Cluee
Carter and is ending wat be found wer web www.
The
band the Indian cand in it are render copy by
Pubtitrasie od
Notices
Krowoder andere bed are constant change. As the research and prince
down inch methods, por medical
want a boccerTY.
Praces and research is always wanten pure and wieder in ea
ating and ag an incremethode pounds, or expected beren in using
och methods thy should be of their safety and the safety of others
Including parties to they have a profesionale
Winspect to any drogor
pharmaceucalpada entidades advised to check
The current proces procecharestatured or by the manufacture of
mach product to bend over the door ons, the method and
duration of Windows it is posible ling
on the prinderea the patients to make down to determine des
and the balance cardul, and to steal app lety precautions
To this the law that the Pusher of the auctors
nyloty or buy and/or dampel person or property materie products
Wierny operation of any products
tidas contained in the main
Library Congress Catalognin Publication Data
hartu
cal dimors in the health probe / Ruth B lurt Regina Dobesty – the
piem
ISBN 978-1-4iphk alkupert Medical Doherty Regina de
des pinces and indes
DNUNG I. i.
Pl. Ptt – 5
BLP
20100395
A Di Lindsay Wrock
Seges. Catherine Judo
See More
in the leden
Working together to grow
libraries in developing countries
—
Lastes de part.876543
FISI
Paying Attention to Outcomes: Teleology
Partially because of some of the criticisms of deontology. telelogic theories
mened, placing the focus on the ends brought about and the consequences
of actions. The most important teleologic theory for our consideration of
health care ethics is stiliaris. This word takes its root from the idea of
utility or usefulness
Utilitarianism
In utilitarianism, an act is right if it helps to bring about the best balance of
benefits over burdens, in other words, the best “utility” or consequences
overall. The original approach was developed first by two English philoso-
phers, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)” and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).32
Note that they are roughly contemporaries of Kant. In fact, they were vigor-
ous opponents of Kant’s position.
From a utilitarian point of view, as a moral agent, you must consider what
several different courses of action could accomplish the goal being to fit the
eaction to the outcome that brings about the most good or least harm overall,
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.